Two years ago, George Soros said he wanted to reorganize the entire global economic system. In two short weeks, he is going to start - and no one seems to have noticed.
On April 8, a group he's funded with $50 million is holding a major economic conference and Soros's goal for such an event is to "establish new international rules" and "reform the currency system." It's all according to a plan laid out in a Nov. 4, 2009, Soros op-ed calling for "a grand bargain that rearranges the entire financial order."
The event is bringing together "more than 200 academic, business and government policy thought leaders' to repeat the famed 1944 Bretton Woods gathering that helped create the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. Soros wants a new 'multilateral system," or an economic system where America isn't so dominant.
More than two-thirds of the slated speakers have direct ties to Soros. The billionaire who thinks "the main enemy of the open society, I believe, is no longer the communist but the capitalist threat" is taking no chances.
Thus far, this global gathering has generated less publicity than a spelling bee. And that's with at least four journalists on the speakers list, including a managing editor for the Financial Times and editors for both Reuters and The Times. Given Soros's warnings of what might happen without an agreement, this should be a big deal. But it's not.
What is a big deal is that Soros is doing exactly what he wanted to do. His 2009 commentary pushed for "a new Bretton Woods conference, like the one that established the post-WWII international financial architecture." And he had already set the wheels in motion.
Read the rest here.
Comment: I have a couple of take aways concerning this article:
One, this is not some wild conspiracy theory; it is happening. Look around, there is a continued steady assault being waged against the nation state by the corporatists, globalists, United Nations, and World Bank to name a few, which has taken place ever since WW I, yes WW I. Why do think the 16th, 17th and Federal Reserve Act were all passed in 1913.
Two, make no mistake about this, the two main parties are involved in this effort with Soros. While I'm not saying every politician is involved, nevertheless there are those politicians well placed in both parties that you read about on a daily basis who are in lock step with the opposition party, and these are the ones that are aligned with this agenda. Americans of every ideology must walk away from the two main parties and start voting upon the principles and ideals of the individual rather than the false left verses right paradigm created by a small group of globalists.
Three, the dismantling of the our economy and building of the international world governance body is moving so fast any chance of applying nullification at the state level will be either too slow or ineffective.
Forth, and what I think is most important, this demonstrates why not only the 17th Amendment must be repealed, but the 16th and the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 as well. Repealing the 16th takes the "fuel" away that propels the plans of the Soros group inside the US; (Soros might be rich, but nothing matches the wealth of the whole of the United States); repealing the 17th Amendment takes away the mechanism that is and will create the legislation dismantling the United States, and will forestall their advance by putting the united states back on an equal footing with the Federal and National Governments; and repealing the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 crushes the action arm of the Soros group.
Certainly there are more comments that can be made and I welcome them, but these are a few that I've considered quickly this morning.
This is real folks. We see the signs that tell us Spring is approaching, but do we see the signs that we are being attacked? Soros is acting in plain sight; we only need to open our eyes to see the truth.
1 comment:
The link between the 17th and the Fed is extremely weak.
Everyone seems to always forget that the Fed did not repeal the gold standard in 1913. Nixon did so in 1971 in order to continue the welfare-warfare state.
Silver was pulled in 1965 for the same reason the penny was inverted in 1982. That preceded the removal of the gold standard by half a decade. The pre-1971 silver-clad half dollar was strictly nostalgic as it was the same 1965 law which set the timeline, not the repeal of the gold standard in 1971 (which again was done by Nixon, not the Fed).
However, there is no link whatsoever between the income tax and either of those things. The income tax simply added a means of revenue raising for the federal government which was declared unconstitutional in 1895. This case occurred almost two decades before the 16th Amendment was ratified. How the money for the welfare-warfare state is raised does not matter. In fact, the 16th amendment took a burden away from the states as the federal government could do more on its own.
This "1913" stuff is complete nonsense and I'm getting tired of repeating the facts again and again on every blog and message board. The gold standard was pulled in 1971, not "1913". Silver was removed in 1965 due to electronics-driven inflation, not "1913". The federal income tax was first attempted in 1895, not "1913".
If we are going to repeal the 17th amendment, we need to avoid this "1913" stuff if we are going to have any credibility beyond the likes of Alex Jones and George Noory.
Post a Comment