Friday, June 03, 2011

There’s a Secret Patriot Act, Senator Says

There’s a Secret Patriot Act, Senator Says;

You think you understand how the Patriot Act allows the government to spy on its citizens. Sen. Ron Wyden says it’s worse than you know.

Congress is set to reauthorize three controversial provisions of the surveillance law as early as Thursday. Wyden (D-Oregon) says that powers they grant the government on their face, the government applies a far broader legal interpretation — an interpretation that the government has conveniently classified, so it cannot be publicly assessed or challenged. But one prominent Patriot-watcher asserts that the secret interpretation empowers the government to deploy ”dragnets” for massive amounts of information on private citizens; the government portrays its data-collection efforts much differently.

“We’re getting to a gap between what the public thinks the law says and what the American government secretly thinks the law says,” Wyden told Danger Room in an interview in his Senate office. “When you’ve got that kind of a gap, you’re going to have a problem on your hands.”

What exactly does Wyden mean by that? As a member of the intelligence committee, he laments that he can’t precisely explain without disclosing classified information. But one component of the Patriot Act in particular gives him immense pause: the so-called “business-records provision,” which empowers the FBI to get businesses, medical offices, banks and other organizations to turn over any “tangible things” it deems relevant to a security investigation.

“It is fair to say that the business-records provision is a part of the Patriot Act that I am extremely interested in reforming,” Wyden says. “I know a fair amount about how it’s interpreted, and I am going to keep pushing, as I have, to get more information about how the Patriot Act is being interpreted declassified. I think the public has a right to public debate about it.”

That’s why Wyden and his colleague Sen. Mark Udall offered an amendment on Tuesday to the Patriot Act reauthorization.

The amendment, first reported by Marcy Wheeler, blasts the administration for “secretly reinterpret[ing] public laws and statutes.” It would compel the Attorney General to “publicly disclose the United States Government’s official interpretation of the USA Patriot Act.” And, intriguingly, it refers to “intelligence-collection authorities” embedded in the Patriot Act that the administration briefed the Senate about in February.

Read the rest here.

Comment: While I welcome Sen Wyden's concern I have to wonder if he has taken the time to actually read the entire bill that has been enacted for close to 10 years now; where as most liberty oriented Americans have known the full truth of this tyrannical law that attacks us, the people, not the terrorists, by destroying the Bill of Rights.


xcopfly said...

Our government is passing more and more nasty laws like the Patriot Act. No matter who we vote for, there is only the continuation of one agenda - defiant opposition to the Constitution.

Our government, in collusion with Media 1.0, are starting to adopt the Internet policies of China and Pakistan. Take a look at this scariness:

There seems to be three industries whose existence and agenda are unanimously supported by Congress and almost never loses federal court cases: Banking, Media 1.0, and Agribusiness.

Brian said...


Spot on!

danq said...

Should've used my real name with something quotable like that :)

On what site did you get the Ron Paul button? I would like to put that on my blog, preferably a smaller version so I didn't have to scale down.