Thursday, January 27, 2011

New CBO Numbers Re-Confirm that Balancing the Budget Is Simple with Modest Fiscal Restraint

New CBO Numbers Re-Confirm that Balancing the Budget Is Simple with Modest Fiscal Restraint; Cato@Liberty


Many of the politicians in Washington, including President Obama during his State of the Union address, piously tell us that there is no way to balance the budget without tax increases. Trying to get rid of red ink without higher taxes, they tell us, would require “savage” and “draconian” budget cuts.
I would like to slash the budget and free up resources for private-sector growth, so that sounds good to me. But what’s the truth?

The Congressional Budget Office has just released its 10-year projections for the budget, so I crunched the numbers to determine what it would take to balance the budget without tax hikes. Much to nobody’s surprise, the politicians are not telling the truth.

The chart below shows that revenues are expected to grow (because of factors such as inflation, more population, and economic expansion) by more than 7 percent each year. Balancing the budget is simple so long as politicians increase spending at a slower rate. If they freeze the budget, we almost balance the budget by 2017. If federal spending is capped so it grows 1 percent each year, the budget is balanced in 2019. And if the crowd in Washington can limit spending growth to about 2 percent each year, red ink almost disappears in just 10 years.


Read the rest of the article here.

1 comment:

Brian said...

Much to nobody’s surprise, the politicians are not telling the truth.

You have to love that quote. Can we expect anything less from the Senate while they do the bidding of special interest?